Basically The Entire Health Care System Hates The New Obamacare Repeal Bill

gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw== - Basically The Entire Health Care System Hates The New Obamacare Repeal Bill

The newest Senate Republican try to repeal the Affordable Care Act and enact sweeping reforms to the American well being care gadget has generated intense opposition from the very well being care suppliers, affected person teams and insurance coverage firms that may be pressured to conform to the adjustments envisioned via the law.

The invoice, subsidized via GOP Sens. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, would undo lots of the Affordable Care Act and radically refashion the Medicaid program via shrinking the budgets for federal well being care methods and turning over the remainder cash to states, which must devise their very own new well being care techniques.

The invoice additionally undermines the Affordable Care Act’s protections for other people with pre-existing stipulations. The effects could be thousands and thousands fewer other people with well being protection. The Senate is slated to vote at the invoice subsequent week.

The well being care sector is, to place it mildly, now not . The following are excerpts from statements issued via nearly each main group representing the pursuits of the well being care gadget and its sufferers.

American Medical Association

“On behalf of the physician and medical student members of the American Medical Association (AMA), I am writing to express our opposition to the Cassidy-Graham-Heller-Johnson Amendment to H.R. 1628, the ‘American Health Care Act of 2017.’ We also urge the Senate to reject any other legislative efforts that would jeopardize health insurance coverage for tens of millions of Americans.”

[Letter to Senate leaders]

American Academy of Pediatrics

“As a pediatrician, I’m apprehensive for my sufferers and the unsure long run they’d face underneath Senators Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Bill Cassidy’s (R-La.) well being care proposal, recently set for a vote subsequent week within the U.S. Senate. As president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, I will have to discuss out by contrast unhealthy, ill-conceived coverage on behalf of our 66,000 pediatrician, pediatric surgical specialist and pediatric clinical subspecialist individuals, and forestall it from advancing. 

“This bill may be disguised under a different name, but it contains the same dangerous policies as the legislation that failed to advance out of the Senate earlier this summer. In fact, Graham-Cassidy goes even further in its attacks on Medicaid.”

[Press release]

American Academy of Family Physicians

American College of Physicians

American Academy of Pediatrics

American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

American Osteopathic Association

American Psychiatric Association

“The undersigned organizations are enthusiastic about the proposal presented nowadays via Senators Cassidy and Graham, which we imagine can have a unfavorable have an effect on on reasonably priced protection for sufferers throughout our country. We would notice equivalent proposal was once put forth via those two Senators in July. Based on our research, the revised proposal might in truth be worse than the unique.

“Our organizations, which represent over 560,000 physicians, oppose the new Graham-Cassidy bill and its approach to reforming our health care system. The proposal fails to protect the health care coverage and consumer protections available under current law. Additionally, it would create a health care system built on state-by-state variability that would exacerbate inequities in coverage and most likely place millions of vulnerable individuals at risk of losing their health care coverage.”

[Letter to Senate leaders]

American College of Physicians

“We believe that the substantial cuts to Medicaid authorized by this legislation would cause a significant increase in the number of uninsured patients and that it would undermine essential benefits provided for patients insured under current law. We urge you to set aside this legislation and instead allow the Senate to consider any improvements to the ACA, through a more deliberative process of regular order, in which hearings are held to solicit the advice of health care experts and stakeholders, with any such improvements considered in a bipartisan manner in which both parties may offer amendments.”

[Letter to Senate leaders]

National Council for Behavioral Health

“Last week, the unsightly well being care debate reared its head once more on Capitol Hill with the creation of a brand new invoice via Senators Graham (R-SC), Cassidy (R-LA), Heller (R-NV) and Johnson (R-WI) to tremendously minimize Medicaid and different federal well being budget to states.

“This bill may go by a different name than previous efforts to reshape the health care system, but it maintains ― and even worsens ― the devastating provisions from those bills that led to a massive constituent outcry earlier this summer. It’s the same pig with different lipstick.”

American Hospital Association

“We imagine that protection might be in peril for tens of thousands and thousands of Americans underneath the Graham-Cassidy proposal. We proceed to induce senators to paintings in a bipartisan approach to handle the demanding situations going through our well being care gadget.

“This proposal would erode key protections for sufferers and customers and does not anything to stabilize the insurance coverage marketplace now or in the longer term. In addition, the block grant to offer fortify for the growth inhabitants expires in 2026, thereby getting rid of protection for thousands and thousands of Americans.

“For these reasons, we oppose the Graham-Cassidy plan.”

Federation of American Hospitals

“The Graham-Cassidy proposal may just disrupt get admission to to well being take care of thousands and thousands of the greater than 70 million Americans who rely on Medicaid and the marketplaces for his or her well being protection.

“It is time to transport directly to safe the well being protection for individuals who have it, and to find answers for individuals who don’t.

“We urge the Senate to reject legislation that fails to move us forward in assuring Americans access to affordable health care and coverage.”

Children’s Hospital Association

“The nation’s children’s hospitals stand in strong opposition to the most recent legislative proposal introduced by Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Bill Cassidy, R-La., Dean Heller, R-Nev., and Ron Johnson, R-Wis. Their legislation would slash funding for Medicaid, the nation’s largest health care program for children, by one-third, reducing access and coverage for more than 30 million children in the program. Furthermore, the legislation weakens important consumer safeguards, and as a result, millions of children in working families would no longer be assured that their private insurance covers the most basic of services without annual and lifetime limits and regardless of any underlying medical condition. This bill would have devastating consequences for children and families.”

Catholic Health Association of the United States

“The Senate is anticipated to vote subsequent week on law presented via Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) & Bill Cassidy (R-LA) to repeal and substitute the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and restructure the Medicaid program.

“I beg you to touch your Senators nowadays and inform them to: 

  • “Vote ‘NO’ at the Graham-Cassidy law to repeal and substitute ACA—which gets rid of Medicaid enlargement protection, top rate tax credit, and cost-sharing relief subsidies and replaces them with state block grants.

  • “Oppose your complete restructuring and deep investment discounts to the Medicaid program within the invoice — capping & slicing federal Medicaid investment, via each in step with capita caps and block grants, essentially undermines the well being care protection web and our talent to serve beneficiaries.

  • “Instead enact bipartisan legislation to stabilize the individual insurance market.”

[Bulletin to member hospitals]

Association of American Medical Colleges

The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) has regularly advocated for numerous key rules as elementary cornerstones of any a success well being care gadget. These rules come with providing high quality, reasonably priced medical insurance to all; retaining and fortifying the security web via Medicaid and different insurance policies; and inspiring innovation within the supply gadget, amongst others. The GCHJ law does now not meet those rules, because it repeals the person and employer mandates, repeals Medicaid enlargement, and caps conventional Medicaid investment. Under this law, the choice of uninsured sufferers national will building up dramatically and vital present affected person protections shall be in peril. Importantly, the GCHJ proposal, which represents an entire overhaul of the well being care gadget, must be totally and adequately tested via the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) earlier than any more motion is taken.”

America’s Essential Hospitals

“Throughout this yr’s well being care debate, America’s Essential Hospitals stood via its place that coverage adjustments will have to take care of protection for individuals who have it, maintain get admission to, and offer protection to hospitals that take care of low-income and different inclined other people.

“While we do not yet have a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) score for the Graham-Cassidy proposal, the plan appears to violate those core principles.”

American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living

“There is not any query that this invoice will undermine take care of inclined seniors and folks with disabilities who depend on Medicaid for his or her day by day long run care. Most of the 1,000,000 individuals who are living in nursing facilities depend on Medicaid, in addition to tens of 1000’s of seniors in America’s assisted dwelling communities.

“As Baby Boomers increasingly need long term services and supports in coming years, our seniors deserve better than an unstable and underfunded safety net. We urge Senators to oppose this legislation and protect Medicaid access for seniors and people with disabilities.”

National Association of Medicaid Directors

 “Any effort of this magnitude needs thorough discussion, examination and analysis, and should not be rushed through without proper deliberation. The legislative proposal would not even have a full CBO score until after its scheduled passage, which should be the bare minimum required for beginning consideration. With only a few legislative days left for the entire process to conclude, there clearly is not sufficient time for policymakers, Governors, Medicaid Directors, or other critical stakeholders to engage in the thoughtful deliberation necessary to ensure successful long-term reforms.”

America’s Health Insurance Plans

“We imagine that legislative proposals that may reform and impact the protection and care of thousands and thousands of Americans must meet positive rules….

“The Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson proposal fails to satisfy those guiding rules, and would have actual penalties on customers and sufferers via additional destabilizing the person marketplace; slicing Medicaid; pulling again on protections for pre-existing stipulations; now not finishing taxes on medical insurance premiums and advantages; and doubtlessly permitting government-controlled, unmarried payer well being care to develop.

“While we cannot support this proposal, we will keep working to find the right solutions that reflect the commitment we all share: affordable coverage and high-quality care for every American. By working together, we can improve health care and deliver the coverage and care that every American deserves.”

[Letter to Senate leaders]

Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

“Although we support providing states with greater flexibility in shaping health care options for their residents, we share the significant concerns of many health care organizations about the proposed Graham-Cassidy bill. The bill contains provisions that would allow states to waive key consumer protections, as well as undermine safeguards for those with pre-existing medical conditions. The legislation reduces funding for many states significantly and would increase uncertainty in the marketplace, making coverage more expensive and jeopardizing Americans’ choice of health plans. Legislation must also ensure adequate funding for Medicaid to protect the most vulnerable.”

Alliance of Community Health Plans

“The GrahamCassidy-Heller-Johnson law being regarded as via the Senate would jeopardize the well being of thousands and thousands of running Americans and we can’t fortify the invoice…

“This proposal would significantly impact the health of our communities, hurting our neighbors, friends and employees. It puts in jeopardy the coverage gains won over the past few years and the critical consumer safeguards provided by essential health benefits and protections afforded by a ban on pre-existing conditions.”

[Letter to Senate leaders]

ALS Association

American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network

American Diabetes Association

American Heart Association

American Lung Association

Arthritis Foundation

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Family Voices

JDRF

Lutheran Services in America

March of Dimes

National Health Council

National Multiple Sclerosis Society

National Organization for Rare Diseases

Volunteers of America

LadiesHeart

“Sixteen affected person and supplier teams oppose the proposal put ahead via Senators Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Dean Heller (R-Nev.), and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) that may negatively have an effect on sufferers’ get admission to to ok and reasonably priced well being protection and care.

“This invoice would prohibit investment for the Medicaid program, roll again vital crucial well being get advantages protections, and doubtlessly open the door to annual and lifelong caps on protection, endangering get admission to to vital take care of thousands and thousands of Americans. Our organizations urge senators to oppose this law.

“Affordable, adequate care is vital to the patients we represent. This legislation fails to provide Americans with what they need to maintain their health.”

AARP

“Older Americans care deeply about access to and affordability of health care. They need and deserve affordable premiums, lower out-of-pocket costs, and coverage they can count on as they age. On behalf of our nearly 38 million members in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, AARP is urging the Senate to reject the Graham/Cassidy/Heller/Johnson bill because it would do precisely the opposite. Overall, the Graham/Cassidy/Heller/Johnson bill would increase health care costs for older Americans with an age tax, decrease coverage, and undermine preexisting condition protections. In addition, this bill would jeopardize the ability of older Americans and people with disabilities to stay in their own homes as they age and threaten coverage for individuals in nursing homes.”

The Arc

“While this piece of legislation has a new title and makes new promises, it is more of the same threats to Medicaid and those who rely on it for a life in the community. The Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson proposal cuts and caps the Medicaid program. The loss of federal funding is a serious threat to people with disabilities and their families who rely on Medicaid for community based supports.”

Consumers Union

“Consumers Union, the coverage and mobilization arm of Consumer Reports, nowadays strongly adversarial the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson proposal, the most recent effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act. This invoice would go away tens of thousands and thousands uninsured and essentially restructure and intestine the Medicaid program. It would additionally permit states to waive key shopper protections and protection necessities….

Consumers Union steered lawmakers to reject this newest partisan proposal and keep excited by bipartisan efforts in Senate committees to stabilize and give a boost to the insurance coverage markets.”

author
Author: 

    Leave a reply "Basically The Entire Health Care System Hates The New Obamacare Repeal Bill"

    Must read×

    Top